最近兩個weeks考12科
今日已經進入尾星,今晚通頂溫書應該就ok啦,不過因為呢考marketing有個案件係全英文有好長
本人雞腸水皮,需要花較多既時間去深入明白之後要寫荷蘭文report,因為仲有好多野所以我想節省d時間... 唔知各位呀靚哥呀靚姐可唔可以幫下我翻譯以下文章呢?因為長既關係以防令大家太攰,所以分開幾部分咁翻譯啦,如果可以一口氣翻譯曬佢我都唔介意架
各位願意幫小弟忙,小弟感激不盡,好趕因為今晚就要架啦
希望願意幫忙的在座各位,首先回復寫 : 我幫你翻譯第x部分(寫明係邊部分),之後再慢慢翻譯
因為咁樣會令其他願意幫忙既人知道你翻譯緊其中既5份1,咁就唔會撞啦
唔好用網上全文翻譯窩,因為係唔得架譯到亂7 8遭
第一部分
BOON RAWD BREWERY: Researching beer brand image and strategy options
This case study brings together quantitative and qualitative research methods to produce some powerful insights into consumer preferences and associations, and reveals alternative brand-positioning strategies. Boon Rawd Brewery is a household name in Thailand, and has an exemplary image as a good employer and a well-managed company with a strong record of social responsibility. The most famous of the company's products is Singha beer.
A research study, initiated by the company, was designed to elicit the positions of certain brands of beer in the minds of consumers, and the associations that were most important to the consumers. The study was also designed to reveal strategic opportunities for new and existing products. The research team brought together a series of customers in several focus groups, in the key geographic markets of Bangkok and Chiangmai. Participants were first asked to fill in a short questionnaire on the attributes they thought were important in choosing a brand.
Participants were then asked to consider six brands of beer predominant in the Thailand beer market. These were:
· Heineken, a global premium brand, originating from Holland, which has seen good growth in market share in previous years
· Carlsberg, another global brand and originating from Denmark
· Singha, the traditional Thai beer, which had seen some image-development work in previous years to increase its acceptability to younger, affluent groups
· Kloster, a beer made in Thailand, but branded and positioned as a European beer
· Leo, a lower-priced beer, which was marketed primarily on a low price/lower quality strategy
· Chang, a recent entrant, brought in on a low-cost strategy to take the lower-end rural market
第2部份
Participants were then asked to rate how similar they thought these brands were with each other. As customers were not asked specific questions about a brand, they were allowed to compare brands on their own criteria. As is the case with most perceptions of brand image, they are often unconscious and sometimes difficult to describe verbally. This rating process meant that researchers' preconceived assumptions about the importance of brand attributes like taste, color, and the even more important personality characteristics such as prestige, softness or hardness, friendliness, and so on, did not interfere in developing these image maps.
How closely each person and each group of people thought the six brands were related, can be summarized in a chart, produced using a technique called multi-dimensional scaling.
Figure 11 shows a perceptual maps. Each dimension on the graph can be interpreted as an attribute that causes the consumers to differentiate between the products. At this stage, these dimensions (axes) were unknown, but the relative distances between the brands are a direct mathematical representation of the "product space" as perceived by the consumer.
It can be seen clearly that Heineken and Kloster were seen as very similar to each other, but different from Singha, Carlsberg, Leo, and Chang. However, it can also be seen that Heineken, Kloster, and Carlsberg were similarly perceived on the horizontal dimension, when compared to Singha and Leo, with Chang being positioned in the middle. On the vertical dimension, there is less differentiation, but it can be seen that Heineken and Kloster, followed closely by Singha, were positioned at one end of the dimension, with Chang at the other end.
Figure 11: Market perception of six beer brands in Thailand
Interpreting these dimensions is key to developing a strategy, and the preciseness with which the dimensions can be defined has a major impact on the validity of the final strategies. This would have to be done next.
Interpretation is a subjective process that, nevertheless, includes the assistance of some statistical methods. If a researcher knows beforehand some of the attributes that are important to a certain market, these attributes can be presented directly to consumers, and brands can again be compared based on these attributes. Several attributes such as cost, taste, image, and packaging attributes were tested, and these were overlaid over the map that had been generated.
Interestingly, the cost dimension did not seem to be highly related to brand choices in this sample of fairly affluent, moderate to heavy beer drinkers. However, some image attributes were highly related, though any one attribute could not explain the difference in the positions completely.