诱人的老师中文字幕在线观看
遊客:  註冊 | 登錄 | 幫助





標題: [疑難] RAID
flash2man (我愛芙蓉姐姐)     Rank: 5Rank: 5Rank: 5
風中藍
性別 保密
UID 19

精華 0
帖子 4160
積分 5664   詳情

閱讀權限 60
註冊 2006-6-23
來自 活在芙蓉姐姐世界
狀態 離線

 
 
 
 
發表於 2006-9-14 01:26 PM  資料  個人空間  短訊  加為好友  Gmail
RAID

X-Seek
此 X-Seek 主題價值 100 XS。 (天藍出手)
X-Seek 出題者 flash2man 希望能在 2006-9-21 01:26 PM 前尋找到解決方案。
已於 2006-9-18 12:30 PM 由 flash2man 選出最合適的解決方案及關閉 X-Seek 主題。

我前兩日幫公司買左一台電腦,機箱裡面係由五個硬盤組成,仲做埋RAID。
因為係二手ge問題,其中一個硬盤已經壽終正寢,發出"逹逹"聲...
我而家都唔敢開機,想問下,我係唔係買個新ge換左壞哥個就得呀?要唔要買返同牌子同型號同容量架?

唔該各位大大呀!



[ 觀看解決方案 ]


最後編輯: mickeyGoUp : 2006-9-14 09:36 PM





頂部

ultraegg (我係2蛋爸爸!)     Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7
版主
性別 男
UID 2550

精華 2
帖子 61835
積分 9054   詳情

閱讀權限 150
註冊 2006-8-1
來自
狀態 離線

 
 
 
 
發表於 2006-9-14 02:16 PM  資料  個人空間  短訊  加為好友 
理論上無錯, 但要知詳細才可以給你一個正確答案! 因為唔知os, 亦唔知setting如何, 例如hdd是否mirror等, 所以請提供詳盡的資料

頂部



francais (咩咩)     Rank: 6Rank: 6
雲中藍 (飄忽的豬)
性別 男
UID 8141

精華 0
帖子 5576
積分 17581   詳情

閱讀權限 70
註冊 2006-8-21
來自 你話邊就邊啦
狀態 離線

 
 
 
 
發表於 2006-9-14 10:33 PM  資料  個人空間  短訊  加為好友  添加 francais 為MSN好友 通過MSN和 francais 交談 Gmail
當然最好就係買返同牌子同型號同容量的硬盤,甘樣現匯發揮raid的作用
仲要睇下你用咩方式組raid,如果係raid0的話坏一個就全部數據都唔用得
如果係raid1,3,5或者0+1都好d,坏一個仲可以用
所以一定要睇你係咩方式,甘先可以幫到你哦~

flash2man :
我查過,我哥部電腦係用Raid1

頂部

christ1188     Rank: 2Rank: 2
藍之初
性別 保密
UID 2852

精華 0
帖子 229
積分 118   詳情

閱讀權限 30
註冊 2006-8-2
來自
狀態 離線

 
 
 
 
發表於 2006-9-15 01:10 AM  資料  個人空間  短訊  加為好友 
理論上無錯,但最好四个一齊換,因硬盤已老了,加上你是買二手機,可以買SATA思奇的,我也正在用。
或不要行RAID就可以不用換了




X-Seek 解決方案 1/4  [ 觀看下一個解決方案 ]  




[b][fly][size=7][color=red]回復就是支持的力量[/color][/size][/fly][/b]
頂部

hkbc_oldcake     Rank: 4Rank: 4
水中藍
性別 保密
UID 21

精華 0
帖子 174
積分 875   詳情

閱讀權限 50
註冊 2006-6-23
來自
狀態 離線

 
 
 
 
發表於 2006-9-15 02:03 PM  資料  個人空間  短訊  加為好友 
For your situation, replacing a drive that is the same or bigger size should be okay, but before you replace the harddrive, you have to access the BIOS of the RAID controller (you can press some keys to access the RAID controller after posting and before the system loads OS), and dismount the faulty drive first.  Then, you can turn off the system, and physically replace the harddrive. Finally, go back to the BIOS of the RAID controller and re-mount this new drive.

I would guess your computer is a server with RAID 5 (since you mentioned it has 5 harddrives with same size).

If you just bought this system, I would suggest you to check how long it's been used before.  Let say if it's been used for more than 2 years, you better follow the suggestion from "christ1188" -- replace all 5 harddrives.  Rightnow the harddrives are not expensive, but it still depends on which standard your computer requires (like IDE, SCSI, SATA ... etc).

About the RAID, mostly the RAID controller is on either an interface card or integrated with the motherboard ...





頂部

francais (咩咩)     Rank: 6Rank: 6
雲中藍 (飄忽的豬)
性別 男
UID 8141

精華 0
帖子 5576
積分 17581   詳情

閱讀權限 70
註冊 2006-8-21
來自 你話邊就邊啦
狀態 離線

 
 
 
 
發表於 2006-9-15 11:15 PM  資料  個人空間  短訊  加為好友  添加 francais 為MSN好友 通過MSN和 francais 交談 Gmail
如果係raid1的話就最容易辦,只要換掉坏的就可以了。raid1的原理是把兩組硬盤互作爲鏡像,即在兩個硬盤中儲存一樣的信息,即使坏掉一個也可以從另外一個中恢復,這種方法組raid安全性最高不過效率最低。但係單數個硬盤組raid1好似怪怪地……

如果係二手機的話我就覺得恢復數據之後全部換過新的硬盤好d了,因爲組raid對硬盤穩定性要求都幾高下。而且建議如果raid控制芯片支持的話就最好組raid5,因爲有5個硬盤組raid1的話太浪費了,浪費佐一半,而raid5安全性效率都適合于5個硬盤~




X-Seek 解決方案 2/4  [ 觀看下一個解決方案 ]  
頂部

pat258     Rank: 3
青出藍
性別 男
UID 452

精華 0
帖子 53
積分 261   詳情

閱讀權限 40
註冊 2006-7-5
來自 加港兩邊走
狀態 離線

 
 
 
 
發表於 2006-9-16 02:21 AM  資料  個人空間  短訊  加為好友 
可以駁 5 隻 HD 行 RAID,好可能係 SCSI HD。

二手電腦,果幾隻 HD 入面的資料你都唔會要掛?  HD 已壞的已壞,未壞的亦用到殘......  唔好理佢邊隻 HD 壞、邊隻 HD 未壞,建議你將全部 HD 換掉,看需要睇下用返幾多隻新 HD,由頭重新 set 過 RAID。

flash2man :
D資料梗係要啦!~~



最後編輯: pat258 : 2006-9-16 02:25 AM




有錢不是萬能,但無錢就萬萬不能!
頂部

  百度     Rank: 3
青出藍
性別 男
UID 3386

精華 0
帖子 320
積分 153   詳情

閱讀權限 40
註冊 2006-8-3
來自 Hong Kong
狀態 離線

 
 
 
 
發表於 2006-9-16 08:00 PM  資料  個人空間  短訊  加為好友 
Hi Fist Check HDD Size made. you don't need replace all the HDD. If you can buy the same one. you don"t need to reinstall windows again. RAID can be rebuild then you replace mew HDD.
RAID is an acronym for Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks.
A RAID array is a collection of drives which collectively act as a
single
storage system, which can tolerate the failure of a drive without losing
data, and which can the drives operate independently of each other.
What are the different RAID levels?
A research group at UC-Berkeley coined the term "RAID", defining six
RAID
levels. Each level is a different way to spread data across multiple
drives--a compromise between cost and speed. Understanding these levelsis
important, because each level is optimized for a different use.
RAID Level 0
RAID Level 0 is not redundant, hence does not truly fit the "RAID"
acronym. In Level 0, data is split across drives, resulting in higherdata
throughput. Since no redundant information is stored, performance is
verygood, but the failure of any disk in the array results in all data loss.
This level is commonly referred to as striping.
RAID Level 1
RAID Level 1 is commonly referred to as mirroring with 2 hard drives. It
provides redundancy by duplicating all data from one drive on another
drive. The performance of a Level 1 array is slightly better than asingledrive,
but if either drive fails, no data is lost. This is a good
entry-level redundant system, since only two drives are required.
However,
since one drive is used to store a duplicate of the data, the cost permegabyte is high.
RAID Level 2
RAID Level 2, wwhich uses Hamming error correction codes, is intendedfor
use with drives which do not have built-in error detection. All SCSI
drives support built-in error detection, so this level is of little use
whenusing SCSI drives.
RAID Level 3
RAID Level 3 stripes data at a byte level across several drives, with
parity stored on one drive. It is otherwise similar to level 4.
Byte-level
striping requires hardware support for efficient use.
RAID Level 4
RAID Level 4 stripes data at a block level across several drives, with
parity stored on one drive. The parity information allows recovery from
the failure of any single drive. The performance of a level 4 array is
very good for reads (the same as level 0). Writes, however, require that
parity data be updated each time. This slows small random writes, in
particular, though large writes or sequential writes are fairly fast.
Because only one drive in the array stores redundant data, the cost per
megabyte of a level 4 array can be fairly low.
RAID Level 5
This level is commonly referred to as striping with distributed parity.
RAID Level 5 is similar to level 4, but distributes parity among the
drives. No single disk is devoted to parity. This can speed small writes
in multiprocessing systems. Because parity data must be distributed on
each drive during reads, the performance for reads tends to be
considerably lower than a level 4 array. The cost per megabyte is thesame
as for level 4.
RAID 0/1 or 10
RAID 0/1 is a dual level array that utilizes multiple RAID 1 (mirrored)
sets into a single array. Data is striped across all mirrored sets. As a
comparison to RAID 5 where lower cost and fault tolerance is important,
RAID 0/1 utilizes several drives, in order to provide betterperformance.
Each drive in the array is duplicated (mirrored). This eliminates the
overhead and delay of parity. This level array offers high data transfer
advantages of striped arrays and increased data accessibility (reads).
System performance during a drive rebuild is also better than that of
parity based arrays, since data does not need to be regenerated from
parity information, but copied from the other mirrored drive.
RAID 0/5 or 50
RAID 0/5 is a dual level array that utilizes multiple RAID5 sets into a
single array. In RAID 0/5 array, a single hard drive failure can occur in
each of the RAID5 without any loss of data on the entire array. Keep in
mind, as the number of hard drives increase in an array, so too, doesthe
increased possibility of a single hard drive failure. Although there is an
increased write performance in RAID 0/5, once a hard drive fails and
reconstruction takes place, there is a noticeable decrease in performance,
data/program access will be slower, and transfer speeds on the array will be effected.
RAID Level Uses
Level 0 (striping)
Any application which requires very high speed storage, but does not need
redundancy. Photoshop temporary files are a good example.
Level 1 (mirroring)
Applications which require redundancy with fast random writes;
entry-level
systems where only two drives are available. Small file servers are an example.
Level 0/1 or 10 (mirroring and striping)
Dual level raid, combines multiple mirrored drives (RAID 1) with data
striping (RAID 0) into a single array. Provides highest performance with data protection.
Level 5 (distributed parity)
Similar to level 4, but may provide higher performance if most I/O is
random and in small chunks. Database servers are an example. Level 0/5 or
50 Dual level raid, combines multiple RAID 5 sets with data striping
(RAID 0). Increased reliability and performance over standard RAID5 that
can stand a multiple drive failure; one hard drive per RAID 5 set.




X-Seek 解決方案 3/4  [ 觀看下一個解決方案 ]  
頂部

  dragonli     Rank: 4Rank: 4
水中藍
性別 保密
UID 101

精華 0
帖子 423
積分 1190   詳情

閱讀權限 50
註冊 2006-6-24
來自 一個遙遠的星球
狀態 離線

 
 
 
 
發表於 2006-9-16 10:22 PM  資料  個人空間  短訊  加為好友 
我估你係行 raid-5,建議買一隻夠大既 single harddisk,ide 或 sata 都無所謂,用 ghost 將 data clone 到新 harddisk,clone 完試下可唔可以只係 boot single harddisk,如果可以 boot 得起,睇睇入面既野係唔係你要既野,ok 的話,你就當果隻係 backup,之後再決定換一隻定換晒咁多隻 harddisk,呢個方法我係最近用過,算係一個比較安全既方法。

p.s. 你好難買到一隻同以前一樣既 harddisk,如果因為個新 harddisk 有咩問題搞林你個 raid-5,一定無得救,是關你唔知道你張 raid-card 會唔會 support 唔同既 harddisk,仲有,如果可以既話,clone 之前最好用人手 backup 入面重要既野,backup 唔怕多,你換到另一個新 raid 而行返晒舊既 os + data,先至係你既責任!




X-Seek 解決方案 4/4   
頂部


快速美言











一群熱心會員對本主題作出以下的回覆:

flash2man: RMK added - PID 23563 [ view ]
flash2man: RMK added - PID 24515 [ view ]



最後回覆日期: 2006-9-18 11:54 AM
  編輯帖子
快速美言
           


當前時區 GMT+8, 現在時間是 2024-11-23 12:19 PM

    Powered by Discuz!  © 2001-2007 Comsenz Inc.   
Processed in 0.017118 second(s), 10 queries

清除 Cookies - 聯繫我們 - LIPS Corner 新天藍 - Archiver