睇左既朋友﹐歡迎入黎俾俾分(按右邊星星)﹐講講齣戲您鐘唔鐘意(中英文回覆都無問題)?

尋找有關此電影的分享 >> 天藍幫您「搜」

definitely entertaining... its good to see Bruce Willis is finally playing in a good movie, as his last few movies have been terrible.  I think people who have been following the die hard films will enjoy this one.  Lots of action and of course, with Maggie Q.

好好睇!唔睇唔得!
雖然唔明點解bruce打極都唔死
其他人一打就死曬
同埋個結局係估得到
但係d動作絕對唔係香港的電影可以拍得上的
story line好好白宮lum左個度絕對嚇到人
絕無悶場
順帶一提
Maggie Q做得唔錯!

1988 年推出第一集既 Die Hard﹐我記得當年我無錢去戲院睇﹐係後來出左錄影帶後﹐同朋友一齊租黎睇既。  仲記得唔知點解﹐當時咁岩果套戲無中文字幕﹐但我朋友話應該都睇得明。 後來果然﹐Die Hard 充滿住動作場面﹐劇情好容易明白。  跟住 Die Hard 2 響 1990 年推出﹐又一次成功大受好評。  頭兩集我好鐘意既原因﹐係因為兩集都有 "困獸鬥" 既感覺﹐都係 John Mclane 一個人要對付一班專業既恐怖份子﹐除左有一種無助既緊張感外﹐亦特顯 John Mclane 既英雄本色。

第三集 Die Hard: With a Vengeance 我就覺得普普通通。 一來故事發生響紐約市﹐無左果種 "困獸鬥" 特色外﹐亦覺得同一套普通既警匪動作片無乜大差別。

所以﹐對今集 Live Free Or Die Hard 期望都唔係太高。  誰不知竟然有一個意外驚喜!  

我贊同 MauMau 同 大小民 既講法!  Live Free Or Die Hard 可以話係無咩冷場﹐由頭踩到落尾﹐動作連場。 故事發生響美國首都 Washington D.C.﹐而今次既恐怖份子所做既事係會影響到全個國家﹐誇就係誇 d﹐但無辦法架喎﹐之前三集都越玩越大﹐觀眾要求越黎越高﹐唔玩誇 d 邊滿足到我地呢?    正因為咁﹐我覺得係近期既 Sequel 片中 (包括 Spiderman, Pirate of the Caribbean, Fantastic Four, ...等, Harry Porter 未睇所以唔知) 比較成功既一套喎!

Maggie Q 演技又好似無咩大進步播...   係打多左囉。  我反而覺得個 Justin Long 做得幾好。  

劇情踢爆 Spoiler Warning

我唔係太明﹐佉係點話?  當有 emergency 時﹐個 system 就會自動將 d data download 去一個大 database 度?  咁佢點樣搵錢呢?

另外我唔係好服就係﹐d 壞人殺人唔斬眼﹐而 John Mclane 對付壞人亦唔會手軟﹐但點解當 Maggie Q 同 John Mclane 打時﹐打低左對方就算呢?  點解要俾機會對方起返身去還拖呢?  而唔係襯對方暈左或者訓低左開幾槍落佢個頭了左件事先做正經野呢?  

我比較欣賞Bruce Willis 在車上的內心話。他說如果有人能做他現在的工作，他一定會退下來。我覺得他是演技派。他在 I  See Dead People 的
演出證明了他不一定要演動作片才會成功。

我贊同!  Bruce Willis 佢又唔係靚仔﹐講動作佢亦唔算係好勁果隻﹐但偏偏佢拍既戲一般都好令觀眾討好!    佢做既角色﹐往往帶住一種憂怨感﹐就好似 Sixth Sense 咁﹐好有味度。 另外一套我好鐘意既戲﹐就係 12 Monkeys!  我覺得 Bruce Willis 做呢類戲好出囉。

劇情踢爆 Spoiler Warning

今次 Die Hard 除左仍然係一貫打不死既風格外﹐加入左一 d 人性入去呢個主角 John Mclane 度﹐可能係見 Spiderman, Casino Royale 果 d 都幾成功打破傳統﹐ Die Hard 都唔執書?   不個眼見個個英雄既背後都係孤獨既﹐不禁對佢地產生一份同情之心。  

John Mclane 話 : "有時候﹐冇人做﹐就唯有我做..."  呢個精神幾有意思!

Personally, the movie is not bad.
However the ending is a bit short and not too exciting.

That's true!  And it is a very typical hollywood style ending.  Sometimes I wonder why hollywood movie can't make a ending more tense.  Audience just know what's gonna happen, everything was so expected.

If you see the title of the movie and still go buy the ticket, then I don't think you should complain
about this kind of things.

No, I was not complaining about this particular movie.  In fact, I was not complaining at all.  I was just talking about the overall Hollywood style and wonder why the movies have to be done in a certain way.  Maybe because of the commercial reasons and boundaries, directors have to follow some kind of formula?  It's about the money, afterall.  I do hope that one day, films from Hollywood will get out of this "cage".